On June 5, of
this year our respected leader of opposition Mrs. Sushma Swaraj danced at
Rajghat while observing one day Satyagraha. That was just part and parcel of ‘Great Indian Political Tamaasha’. The
news booked front pages for a week or so. Then criticism rounds followed by
confession rounds were the expectation from within the party or outside the
party. Dancing is ‘ecstasy’ by William Wordsworth. So ‘Swaraj’ becomes
spiritual. The dance or ecstasy is over; media is looking up for other dancers.
Is it that only dancers dance not the politicians? Omar Abdullah specifically
tweeted that, his father is a better dancer than Mrs. Sushma Swaraj. Yes,
indeed the impact of reality shows is showing up many more, ‘dance netaji dance’. But how does this
impact the general public? For them it is only a source of entertainment which
is projected by the media. “Dancing is a perpendicular expression to the
horizontal desire”. This must have inspired Sushma Swaraj and also many of us.
Right to Expression is a fundamental right. Ecstasy is divine and spiritually
quoted. It can be expressed in any form and one of which is Dance. Dance lifts
the spirit, strengthens body, stimulates mind and entertains self and people.
Swaraj means self rule our leader of opposition was ruling herself. And half of
her name is ‘Swaraj’ too. What harm has been caused to the public and internal
security of the country? Does dancing make someone irresponsible and
uncomfortable? Yes, congress was in unrest.
Now let us try
to analyze this dancing activity from the perspective of:-
Firstly, ‘aam aadmi’ (indeed a satyagrahi, don’t
know of Gandhi’s & Anna’s or a Swaraj fan), this person would have been
overjoyed on seeing Mrs. Swaraj in ecstasy. Secondly, the idiot box audiences,
who eagerly waited for almost an hour of breaking news to have a glimpse of a
video clip with, red circle indicating Swaraj. They were not able to make out
the logic of news channels and the dance both. Thirdly the criticizers of the
power block were of the view that it somehow didn’t jelled with sanctity of the
place (Rajghat). Many co-criticizers objected the act as offending the national
pride or more precisely the status and the role of a parliamentarian. Even
Nitin Gadkari(from whom words are prized out) opened lips just to confess on
behalf of BJP Swaraj.
Now let us go in
the past on Poorna Swaraj night (Pre independence era, year 1929 Congress
Session at Lahore). Our honourable, radical congress leader Jawaharlal Nehru
also was in divine mood on patriotic songs (in the same way as we are on
Independence or Republic day). So how dare he dance? Does he didn’t knew that
he was marking the occasion of ‘Poorna Swaraj’. This was one of the landmark or
milestone in the journey of freedom struggle. So did Mr. Nehru’s action which
were much appreciated by our father of the nation and he was happy to see him
in ecstasy and advised to be like that wherever he gets an opportunity to
express his feelings.
So didn’t Mrs.
Swaraj have the same right to express her feelings in the same manner as our
first PM expressed? In both the cases the dance was against the government, one
at Rajghat and other at Ghat of river Ravi. In the former case the ruling
government criticized the action with equal and opposite reaction and the party
president confessed. Whereas in latter case, though not criticized by the
rulers but was appreciated by inmates.
Mrs. Swaraj
needed a shoulder as their own party mates didn’t liked. And in few minutes
Swaraj comes in cadre of ‘Sheela and
Munni’. So Mrs. Swaraj what is your fault? It is just that you opted for
Robert Frosts’ ‘The road not taken’.
Swaraj in half
can’t justify, but complete Swaraj can. That is why idea of dominion status was
rejected. No one to blame (few blames media), better luck next time Mrs Sushma
Swaraj. Hope to see you attain Poorna Swaraj to escape from media controversies
and an observational note like this one.
No comments:
Post a Comment